Home > Forecasts & Analysis > 1. Background and Methodology > Reducing NO and Hg Emissions

Reducing Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Mercury from Electric Power Plants
 

Reducing NO and Hg Emissions

Considerable uncertainty exists about the ability of various types of emissions control equipment to remove Hg and, to a lesser extent, NOx. Many factors affect the level of Hg emissions from a particular power plant, including the Hg content (by speciation—elemental Hg versus various Hg-containing compounds), chlorine content, and other chemical constituents of the coal used; the rank of the coal (i.e., bituminous or subbituminous); the boiler temperature and firing type and the flue gas temperature; and the types of existing control equipment for NOx, SO2, and particulates. In recent years data collection and analysis efforts have focused on these factors so that better estimates of current power sector Hg emissions could be developed; however, substantial uncertainty remains. As additional tests are performed, factors currently unaccounted for may turn out to be important.

Data collected by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1999 showed considerable variation in the content of Hg in the coal used by power plants and in the amount of Hg that was removed by the existing equipment at those power plants. On average the sample data show that the Hg content of coal shipped in 1999 was 7.3 pounds per trillion British thermal units (Btu), or approximately 0.2 pounds of Hg per thousand short tons of coal; however, there was considerable variation among coals from different seams, even within a given coal supply region. For example, the 1999 data indicated that coal shipments from the Pittsburgh seam in Northern Appalachia had an average Hg content of 8.2 pounds per trillion Btu, whereas shipments from the Upper Freeport seam averaged 16.4 pounds Hg per trillion Btu.

Even within the same coal seam, the tested shipment data show considerable variation in Hg content. For example, although the average Hg content for the Pittsburgh seam was 8.2 pounds per trillion Btu, the minimum for shipments from that seam was 0.1 pounds per trillion Btu and the maximum was 73.1 pounds per trillion Btu. In statistical terms, the standard deviation for Hg content at the Pittsburgh seam is 4.04, indicating that most samples should have Hg contents between 0.1 and 16.3 pounds of Hg per trillion Btu.

The Hg removal rates for the various coal plant configurations also showed significant variation. The 1999 data show that, on average, a cold-side electrostatic precipitator (CSE)—a particulate removal device— removes 31 percent of the Hg that passes through it. However, the variation among plants with CSEs was large, ranging between 0 percent and 87 percent removal. The situation was similar for facilities with fabric filters—another type of particulate removal device. On average they removed 69 percent of the Hg passing through them, but, after excluding plants that actually reported increases in Hg after passing flue gas through the fabric filter, the removal rate ranged between 54 percent and nearly 100 percent.

In addition, there is very little information on the impact of new NOx control devices—selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) equipment—on Hg emissions. Although many plant owners plan to add them in the near future, only a few are using them now. With respect to NOx, SCRs are assumed to reduce emissions by 75 to 80 percent on average; however, because so few plants have SCRs today, the true cost and performance of the technology are not known at this time. With respect to Hg, this study assumes that, when combined with an SO2 scrubber, an SCR enhances Hg removal with an emissions modification factor of 0.65 (increases Hg removal by 35 percent); however, no additional removal is assumed for plant configurations that have an SCR but do not have an SO2 scrubber. Some pilot-scale tests suggest that SCRs would increase Hg removal for some system configurations, but the magnitude of the impact is not known at this time.

Representation of New Environmental Rules and Regulations

In Energy Information Administration (EIA) analyses, the reference case incorporates rules and regulations in place at the time of the preparation of the report. Rules or regulations that are not finalized, are in early stages of implementation (without specific guidelines), or are still being developed or debated are not represented. As an independent statistical and analytical agency, EIA does not take positions on how legislative or regulatory issues will be resolved or how rules or regulations will, or should, be implemented.

The reference case for this analysis excludes several potential environmental actions, such as new regulations affecting regional haze, for which States are developing implementation plans; the implementation of new National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulates, which is still being reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the courts; and the possible ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. In addition, no effort is made to predict the outcome of ongoing studies of the need to reduce power plant Hg emissionsa or the resolution of lawsuits against the owners of coal-fired power plants accused of violating the Clean Air Act (CAA).

In June 1999, the EPA issued regulations to improve visibility (reduce regional haze) in 156 national parks and wilderness areas across the United States. It is expected that these rules will have an effect on power plants, but the degree to which they will be affected is not known. Power plant emissions of SO2 and NOx, which contribute to the formation of regional haze, may have to be reduced to improve visibility in some areas. The regulations call for States to establish goals and design plans for improving the visibility in affected areas; however, State implementation plans (SIPs) are not required until 2004 or later and therefore are not represented in this analysis, because they have not yet been promulgated.

The revised NAAQS, issued by the EPA in 1997, created a standard for fine particles smaller than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5). As with regional haze, power plant emissions of SO2 and NOx are a component of fine particulate emissions. At the request of the President (memorandum July 16, 1997), the EPA is now reviewing scientific data on fine particulate emissions to determine whether to revise or maintain the standard. The review is expected to be completed in 2002. If the standard is maintained, States will be required to submit plans to comply by 2005.

In December 1997, 160 countries met to negotiate binding limitations on greenhouse gas emissions for the developed nations. CO2 emissions from fossil-fired power plants are a key component of greenhouse gas emissions. The developed nations agreed to limit their greenhouse gas emissions to 5 percent below the levels emitted in 1990, on average, between 2008 and 2012. The target for the United States is 7 percent below the 1990 emission level for all greenhouse gases. Reductions would be required if the U.S. Senate ratified the protocol. However, the President has indicated that the United States will not support the approach called for in the Protocol. At this time, while 39 countries have ratified the protocol, only one Annex I (developed) country, Romania, has ratified the agreement. In addition, various elements of the Protocol are still under negotiation.

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA90), Section 112(n)(1)(A), required that the EPA prepare a study of hazardous air emissions from steam generating units. The report was submitted to Congress on February 24, 1998. Its key finding was that Hg emissions from coal-fired power plants posed the greatest potential for harm. The EPA is now collecting and analyzing data on Hg emissions from specific power plants. The data, together with continuing studies on the health effects of Hg, will be used to determine the extent to which emissions need to be reduced. The EPA will be developing proposed regulations for reducing Hg emissions over the next 3 years.

On November 3, 1999, the Justice Department, on behalf of the EPA, filed suit against seven electric utility companies, accusing them of violating CAAA90 by not installing state-of-the-art emissions control equipment on their power plants when major modifications were made. CAAA90 requires that when major modifications are made to older power plants they must also be upgraded to comply with the emissions standards for new power plants. The EPA is arguing that the seven companies and the Tennessee Valley Authority made major modifications to 32 power plants but did not add the required emissions control equipment. The continued pursuit and outcome of these cases is uncertain at this time.

Readers should keep in mind that some of the projected actions and costs incurred to comply with the emissions caps analyzed in this report may also result from the other pending rules and regulations discussed above when they are finalized. Projections in the reference case in this report are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The reference projections are business-as-usual trend forecasts, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. Thus, they provide a policy-neutral reference case that can be used to analyze policy initiatives. EIA does not propose, advocate, or speculate on future legislative and regulatory changes. All laws are assumed to remain as now enacted; however, the impacts of emerging regulatory changes, when defined, are reflected.


aOn December 15, 2000, the EPA announced that Hg emissions need to be reduced, and that regulations will be issued by 2004.