Home > Forecasts & Analysis > Introduction > Reducing NOx and Hg Emissions

Analysis of Strategies for Reducing Multiple Emissions from Electric Power Plants with Advanced Technology Scenarios
 

Reducing NOx and Hg Emissions

Considerable uncertainty exists about the ability of various types of emissions control equipment to remove Hg and, to a lesser extent, NOx. Many factors affect the level of Hg emissions from a particular power plant, including the Hg content (by speciation—elemental Hg versus various Hg-containing compounds), chlorine content, and other chemical constituents of the coal used; the rank of the coal (i.e., bituminous or subbituminous); the boiler temperature and firing type and the flue gas temperature; and the types of existing control equipment for NOx, SO2, and particulates. In recent years data collection and analysis efforts have focused on these factors so that better estimates of current power sector Hg emissions could be developed; however, substantial uncertainty remains. As additional tests are performed, factors currently unaccounted for may turn out to be important.

Data collected by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1999 showed considerable variation in the content of Hg in the coal used by power plants and in the amount of Hg that was removed by the existing equipment at those power plants. On average the sample data show that the Hg content of coal shipped in 1999 was 7.3 pounds per trillion British thermal units (Btu), or approximately 0.2 pounds of Hg per thousand short tons of coal; however, there was considerable variation among coals from different seams, even within a given coal supply region. For example, the 1999 data indicated that coal shipments from the Pittsburgh seam in Northern Appalachia had an average Hg content of 8.2 pounds per trillion Btu, whereas shipments from the Upper Freeport seam averaged 16.4 pounds Hg per trillion Btu.

Even within the same coal seam, the tested shipment data show considerable variation in Hg content. For example, although the average Hg content for the Pittsburgh seam was 8.2 pounds per trillion Btu, the minimum for shipments from that seam was 0.1 pounds per trillion Btu and the maximum was 73.1 pounds per trillion Btu. In statistical terms, the standard deviation for Hg content at the Pittsburgh seam is 4.04, indicating that most samples should have Hg contents between 0.1 and 16.3 pounds of Hg per trillion Btu.

The Hg removal rates for the various coal plant configurations also showed significant variation. The 1999 data show that, on average, a cold-side electrostatic precipitator (CSE)—a particulate removal device— removes 31 percent of the Hg that passes through it. However, the variation among plants with CSEs was large, ranging between 0 percent and 87 percent removal. The situation was similar for facilities with fabric filters—another type of particulate removal device. On average they removed 69 percent of the Hg passing through them, but, after excluding plants that actually reported increases in Hg after passing flue gas through the fabric filter, the removal rate ranged between 54 percent and nearly 100 percent.

In addition, there is very little information on the impact of new NOx control devices—selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) equipment—on Hg emissions. Although many plant owners plan to add them in the near future, only a few are using them now. With respect to NOx, SCRs are assumed to reduce emissions by 75 to 80 percent on average; however, because so few plants have SCRs today, the true cost and performance of the technology are not known at this time. With respect to Hg, this study assumes that, when combined with an SO2 scrubber, an SCR enhances Hg removal with an emissions modification factor of 0.65 (increases Hg removal by 35 percent); however, no additional removal is assumed for plant configurations that have an SCR but do not have an SO2 scrubber. Some pilot-scale tests suggest that SCRs would increase Hg removal for some system configurations, but the magnitude of the impact is not known at this time.