Power
Sector Mercury Emissions
Many factors, including the Hg content (by speciationelemental Hg versus
various Hg-containing compounds), chlorine content, and other chemical constituents
of the coal used; the rank of the coal (i.e., bituminous or subbituminous);
the boiler temperature and firing type and the flue gas temperature; and the
types of existing control equipment for NOx, SO2, and
particulates affect the level of Hg emissions from a particular power plant.
In recent years data collection and analysis efforts have focused on these factors
so that better estimates of current power sector Hg emissions could be developed;
however, substantial uncertainty remains. As additional tests are performed,
factors currently unaccounted for may turn out to be important.
Section 112(n)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 required the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to perform a study of possible public
health problems associated with hazardous air pollutants from steam-electric
power plants. That study was completed in December 1997 and transmitted to the
Congress.a One of its key findings was that Hg emissions from coal-fired
power plants posed the greatest public health concern among the hazardous air
pollutants identified; however, the EPA determined that more data were needed
before regulatory decisions could be made.
Using its authority under section 114 of the Clean Air Act, in November 1998
the EPA issued an information collection request (ICR) requiring coal-fired
power plants to provide data associated with Hg emissions. The ICR data were
collected in three phases. The first phase involved the collection of basic
informationboiler type, size, existing emissions control equipment, etc.for
every coal-fired generator with 25 megawatts or greater capacity. The second
phase was the collection of fuel shipment information for each of the electric
power plants identified in the first phase. Each of the electric power plants
was required to report the quantity and source of each coal shipment received
for the calendar year 1999. For every sixth shipment (a minimum of 3 analyses
per month) the plants also had to report the Hg and chlorine content of the
coal received. In the third phase of the ICR, 75 plants were selected to test
the Hg emissions at the inlet and outlet of the last pollution control device
on one or more units. The plants used were chosen to be representative of the
different types of existing coal plants.
The ICR data are the primary information used in this report to assign Hg content
to the coal supply curves in the NEMS Coal Market Module and the Hg emissions
modification factors for each coal plant type represented in the Electricity
Market Module. On average the sample data show that the Hg content of coal shipped
in 1999 was 7.3 pounds per trillion Btu (approximately 0.2 pounds of Hg per
thousand short tons of coal); however, there was considerable variation among
coals from different seams, even within a given coal supply region. For example,
the 1999 ICR data indicated that coal shipments from the Pittsburgh seam in
Northern Appalachia had an average Hg content of 8.2 pounds per trillion Btu,
whereas shipments from the Upper Freeport seam averaged 16.4 pounds Hg per trillion
Btu. Even within the same coal seam the tested shipment data show considerable
variation in Hg content. For example, although the average Hg content for the
Pittsburgh seam was 8.2 pounds per trillion Btu, the minimum for shipments from
that seam was 0.1 pounds per trillion Btu and the maximum was 73.1 pounds per
trillion Btu. In statistical terms, the standard deviation for Hg content at
the Pittsburgh seam is 4.04, indicating that most samples should have Hg contents
between 0.1 and 16.3 pounds of Hg per trillion Btu.
The Hg removal rates for the various coal plant configurations also showed significant
variation. Data from the third phase of the ICR show that on average a cold-side
electrostatic precipitator (CSE)a particulate removal deviceremoves
31 percent of the Hg that passes through it. However, the variation among plants
with CSEs was large, ranging between 0 percent and 87 percent removal. The situation
was similar for facilities with fabric filtersanother type of particulate
removal device. On average they removed 69 percent of the Hg passing through
them, but, after excluding plants that actually reported increases in Hg after
passing flue gas through the fabric filter, the removal rate ranged between
54 percent and nearly 100 percent. In addition, there is very little information
on the impact of new NOx control devicesselective non-catalytic
reduction (SNCR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) equipmenton Hg
emissions because, while many plants plan to add them in the near future, only
a few are using them now. This study assumes that, when combined with an SO2 scrubber, an SCR enhances Hg removal with an emissions modification factor of
0.65; however, no additional removal is assumed for plant configurations that
have an SCR but do not have an SO2 scrubber.
Additional research is needed on the variations seen in the available data.
Over the next several years the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL),
the EPA, and others plan to conduct full-scale tests of various Hg removal technologies
on several coal plants. This analysis assumes the use of activated carbon injection
technologies to remove Hg, because they have been tested at pilot scale; however,
there are other technologies in development, including advanced coal cleaning
techniques, alternative absorbents, and more efficient use of absorbents (recycling
absorbents rather than once-through systems) to remove Hg from flue gas.
In addition, efforts to understand the role of chlorine and other chemicals
in coal on the amount of Hg removed are underway. Data from those tests and
from other ongoing research should allow a better understanding of the factors
influencing Hg emissions and improve analyses of options for reducing them.
Although this report uses the best data available, considerable uncertainty
exists about the measurement of and options for reducing Hg emissions from coal-fired
power plants.
aU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mercury Study Report to Congress,
EPA-452/R-97-003 (Washington, DC, December 1997).
|