Revenue Adequacy and Relative Dependence on Coal Revenue by Railroad, 1989-1995

Railroad

1989

1991

1993

1995

Percent of Total Revenue From Coal

Rate of Return on Investment

Percent of Total Revenue From Coal

Rate of Return on Investment

Percent of Total Revenue From Coal

Rate of Return on Investment

Percent of Total Revenue From Coal

Rate of Return on Investment

Eastern District

               

 Conrail

15.4 2.6 16.8  NM 14.2 6.5 15.9 6.8
 CSX 34.4 6.1 35.3  NM 29.9 0.1 29.8 6.5
 Florida East Coast 1.1 10.3 1.0 2.2  NA  NA  NA  NA
 Grand Trunk Western 8.1 1.9 9.4  NM 8.2  NM 7.9  NM
 Illinois Central 16.0 11.2 15.2 15.2 12.7 14.7 13.9 17.2
 Norfolk Southern 36.1 11.9 37.0 6.0 32.9 12.1 30.9 12.1
Western District                
 Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe 7.7  NM 8.9 6.5 8.7 1.9 7.3 5.3
 Burlington Northern 33.0 12.5 33.5  NM 31.9 9.4 32.7 6.3
 Chicago & Northwestern 12.4 8.2 14.1 7.1 13.5 10.3 15.5  NA
 Kansas City Southern 33.7 10.7 31.9 9.3 29.9 9.0 19.7 7.9
 Soo Line 11.3  NM 12.8 4.0 9.2  NM 3.8  NM
 Southern Pacific 2.2 1.8 2.4  NM 3.2 3.5 9.4 1.3
 St. Louis Southwestern 2.6 1.8 2.2  NM 3.2 3.5 9.4 1.3
 Union Pacific 16.1 10.4 17.5 1.7 16.8 11.1 19.0 11.7
NM = negative returns on investment are described only as “not meaningful” in the source.
NA = not available, usually because the railroad has ceased to operate as an independent entity.
Source: Federal Railroad Administration.