|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
DOE/EIA-0484(2001) Report
|
Nuclear Power References
1. A.J. González, International Atomic Energy Agency, American Nuclear Society Meeting, San Diego, CA (June 5, 2000). 2. “Turkey Holds Up Nuclear Power Plant,” Europe Energy (July 28, 2000), p. 1. 3. Web site www.internetwire.com/technews/eg/ 22990162.dsl. 4. E.R. Blume, “Why They Buy Nuclear,” Electric Perspectives (March/April 2000), pp. 36-48. 5. P. Hollins, “British Energy Seals Canada Deal,” The Scotsman (July 12, 2000), p. 18. 6. International Atomic Energy Agency, web site www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.eaf-y.htm. 7. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 1999, DOE/EIA-0384(99) (Washington, DC, July 2000), p. 247. 8. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 1999, DOE/EIA-0384(99) (Washington, DC, July 2000), p. 247. 9. “Finnish Industry Minister Says She’ll Back Fifth Nuclear Unit,” Nucleonics Week, Vol. 41. No. 19 (May 11, 2000), p. 3. 10. A.J. González, International Atomic Energy Agency, American Nuclear Society Meeting, San Diego, CA (June 5, 2000). 11. L. Bauerova, “Austria Fights Nuclear Plant Near Czech Border,” New York Times (September 24, 2000), p. A7. 12. Y. Sharma, “Europe Unlikely To Follow Germany’s Nuclear Lead,” South China Morning Post (June 18, 2000), p. 7. 13. S.R. Hatcher, “Global Development of Nuclear Power,” Nuclear News (March 2000), p. 52. 14. “Politicians Maneuver on Whether To Order Barsebaeck-2 Shutdown,” Nucleonics Week (August 17, 2000), p. 3. 15. G. Boehmer, “Nuclear Power Is on Its Way Out Across Europe,” Associated Press(January 3, 1999). 16. W. Sandtner, “The German Policy of Phasing-Out of Nuclear and Its Implications,” in Business as Ususal and Nuclear Power (Paris, France: International Energy Agency, October 1999), p. 48. 17. “Nuclear Waste: Resumption of Shipments Between France and Germany,” Europe Energy (February 6, 2001), p. 1. 18. “Nuclear Energy: Belgium To Phase Out Atomic Option,” Europe Energy (July 23, 1999), p. 1. 19. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Annual 1998, DOE/EIA-0219(98) (Washington, DC, January 2000), p. 91. 20. “Nuclear Energy: Belgium To Phase Out Atomic Option,” Europe Energy (July 23, 1999), p. 1. 21. “Swiss Extend Nuclear Law by 10 Years Pending New One,” Reuters, web site www.planetark. org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=8437 (October 5, 2000). 22. International Atomic Energy Agency, web site www.iaea.org. 23. “Duke Gets 20-Year Extension for Three-Unit Oconee,” Nucleonics Week, Vol. 41 No. 21 (May 25, 2000), p. 1. 24. R. McCaffrey, “Energizing Nuclear Plants’ Hopes; MD Firm Capitalizes on Role in Winning Calvert Cliffs Permits,” The Washington Post (January 2, 2001), p. B3. 25. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web site www.nrc.gov/ NRC/ NUREGS/ SR1350/ V11/ part11.html. 26. A. Chambers, “License Renewals Gain Steam,” Power Engineering (June 2000), p. 7. 27. K. Darce, “Gone Fission: Once the Bane of American Utilities, Nuclear Power Has Become Profitable Venture for Entergy and a Handful of Companies Competing To Buy More Plants,” New Orleans Time-Picayune (March 5, 2000), p. F1. 28. M. Burton and L. Olver, “Shut Down: Can Nuclear Plants Survive Deregulation? The Jury Is Still Out,” The Wall Street Journal (September 14, 1998), p. R21. 29. “Entergy, Pilgrim Purchase First of How Many?,” Nuclear News (January 1999), p. 13. 30. D. Donogue, D. Haarmeyer, and R.T. McWhinney, “The U.S. Nuclear Plant Market: The Search for Value,” Nuclear News (June 2000), p. 32. 31. Edison Electric Institute, Divestiture Action and Analysis (June 2000), p. 4. 32. P. Fenn, “Love Is Hate, War Is Peace, and Nuclear Power Is Green: The Coming Nuclear Revival,” Local Power News, web site www.local.org/ nukerevi.html. 33. Edison Electric Institute, Divestiture Action and Analysis (June 2000), p. 16. 34. “Dominion’s Bid for Millstone Is Highest Yet for Nuclear Plant,” Nucleonics Week (August 10, 2000), p. 1. 35. T. Knauss, “Nine Mile Point Nuclear Plants To Sell for $950 Million: Baltimore Company To Operate Two Units,” The Post Standard (December 13, 2000), p. A1. 36. J. Whitlock, “The Canadian Nuclear FAQ,” web site www.ncf.carleton.ca/-cz725/cnf.html (September 26, 2000). 37. “Alberta To Continue To Mitigate High Power Prices With Rebates; Canada’s Nuclear Regulators To Consider Restarting Mothballed Bruce Nuclear Generators,” Foster Electric Report (January 17, 2001), p. 13. 38. Bulletin Wire of the Atomic Scientists (June 20, 2000), web site www.bullatomsci.org/ bulletinwirearchive/BULLETINWire000620.html. 39. “Time for Nuclear Power To Awake From Its Stupor,” Engineering News Record (November 13, 2000), p. 104. 40. “Panel Calls N-Power Key Energy Source,” The Daily Yomiuri Shinbun (November 22, 2000), p. 1. 41. U.S. General Accounting Office, Nuclear Safety Concerns With the Continuing Operation of Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Reactors, GAO/RCED-00-97 (Washington, DC, April 2000). 42. L. Lederman, “Safety of RBMK Reactors: Setting the Technical Framework,” web site www.iaea.org/ worldatom/inforesource/bulletin/ bull381/ rbmk. html. 43. G. Verheugen, “EU/Lithunia: Donors Conference Meets Target As Lithuania Seeks More Member State Support,” European Report (June 26, 2000), p. 1. 44. “Kozloduy Chief Confirms Years for Shutdown of Units 1 and 2,” Nucleonics Week (June 22, 2000), p. 6. 45. A. Ivanov, “Bulgaria To Shutdown Older Nuclear Reactors, BBC Monitoring Newsfile (July 13, 2000), p. 1. 46. “U.S. Westinghouse Signs Contract To Update Bulgarian Nuclear Reactors,” BBC Monitoring Service (February 15, 2001), p. 1. 47. “Slovak Nuclear Plant Under Reconstruction Despite Plans To Decommission It,” BBC Monitoring European (January 7, 2000), p. 1. 48. Nuclear Energy Institute, Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Plants in Russia, Ukraine, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Hungary, and Bulgaria, Fifth Edition (1997). 49. “Decades-Old Nuclear Project Almost Finished, Engineering News Record (August 14, 2000), p. 9. 50. P. Muello, “Plagued by Setbacks Nuclear Plant Prepares To Go on Line in Brazil,” Fort Worth Star (January 10, 1999), p. 18. 51. S.R. Hatcher, “Global Development of Nuclear Power,” Nuclear News (March 2000), p. 35. 52. Quest Economics Database, “Country Profile: Argentina” (November 17, 1999), p. 1. 53. D. Pilling, “Argentina To Go on With N-Plans,” Financial Times (June 6, 1996), p. 4. 54. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 1999, DOE/EIA-0348(99) (Washington, DC, July 2000), p. 301. 55. “Castro Halts Work on Nuclear Reactor,” Miami Herald (September 1998), web site http:// 64.21.33.164/CNews/y98/sept98/30e4.htm. 56. K. Platt, “China’s Nuclear-Power Program Loses Steam: Sources Say the Next Five-Year Plan May Pull the Plug on More Atomic Plants,” The Christian Science Monitor (July 21, 2000), p. 7. 57. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web site http:// nrc.gov/ NRC/ NUREGS/ SR1350/ V11/ part19.html. 58. S.R. Hatcher, “Global Development of Nuclear Power,” Nuclear News (March 2000), p. 37. 59. H. Chu, “Taiwan Court Tiptoes Around Debate Over Nuclear Power,” Los Angeles Times (January 16, 2001), p. A11. 60. S.R. Hatcher, “Global Development of Nuclear Power,” Nuclear News (March 2000), p. 40. 61. A.L. Kazmin, “Critical Mess in India,” Business Week (December 6, 1999). 62. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web site http:// nrc.gov/ NRC/ NUREGS/ SR1350/ V11/ part19.html. 63. “Turkey Holds Up Nuclear Power Plant,” Europe Energy, July 28, 2000, p. 1. 64. “Eskom’s Pebble Bed Reactor Presented to Government,” Nuclear News, May 2000, p. 39. 65. “PECO Invests in Eskom’s Project,” Africa News Service, August 30, 2000, p. 1.
If you would like to receive any information relating to our reports via e-mail, click here, select "forecasts" and the specific list(s) you would like to join, and subscribe by entering your e-mail address.
URL: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/ieo01/nuclearref.htmlNeed Help
Now? |
