|
Notes
and Sources
Market Trends
[101] Energy-intensive industries include food, paper,
bulk chemicals, petroleum refining, glass, cement, steel, and aluminum.
[102] The reference case represents EIA’s current
judgment regarding Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’
(OPEC) expected behavior in the mid-term where production is adjusted
to keep world oil prices in the $22 to $28 per barrel range. Since
OPEC, particularly the Persian Gulf nations, is expected to be the
dominant supplier of oil in the international market over the mid-term,
the organization’s production choices will significantly affect
world oil prices. The low oil price scenario could result from a
future market where all oil production becomes more competitive.
The high price scenario could result from a more cohesive and market-assertive
OPEC with lower production goals and other non-financial (geopolitical)
considerations.
[103] The transportation sector has been left out
of these calculations because levels of transportation sector electricity
use have historically been far less than 1 percent of delivered
electricity. In the transportation sector, the difference between
total and delivered energy consumption is also less than 1 percent.
[104] The definition of the commercial sector for
AEO2004 is based on data from the 1999 Commercial Buildings Energy
Consumption Survey (CBECS). See Energy Information Administration,
1999 CBECS Public Use Data Files (October 2002), web site www.eia.doe.gov/
emeu/cbecs/. Nonsampling and sampling errors (found in any statistical
sample survey) resulted in a higher commercial floorspace estimate
than found with the 1995 CBECS. In addition, 1999 CBECS energy intensities
varied from earlier estimates, providing a different composition
of end-use consumption. These factors contribute to the pattern
of commercial energy use projected for AEO2004. Further discussion
is provided in Appendix G.
[105] The intensities shown were disaggregated using
the divisia index. The divisia index is a weighted sum of growth
rates and is separated into a sectoral shift or “output” effect
and an energy efficiency or “substitution” effect. It has at least
two properties that make it superior to other indexes. First, it
is not sensitive to where in the time period or in which direction
the index is computed. Second, when the effects are separated, the
individual components have the same magnitude, regardless of which
is calculated first. See Energy Information Administration, “Structural
Shift and Aggregate Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing” (unpublished
working paper in support of the National Energy Strategy, May 1990);
and Boyd et al., “Separating the Changing Effects of U.S. Manufacturing
Production from Energy Efficiency Improvements,” Energy Journal,
Vol. 8, No. 2 (1987).
[106] Estimated as consumption of alternative transportation
fuels in crude oil Btu equivalence. Alternative fuels include ethanol,
electricity, hydrogen, natural gas, and propane.
[107] Federal Register, Volume 68, No. 66, Monday,
April 7, 2003, pp.16868-16900.
[108] Small light trucks (compact pickup trucks and
compact vans) are used primarily as passenger vehicles, whereas
medium light trucks (compact utility trucks and standard vans) and
large light trucks (standard utility trucks and standard pickup
trucks) are used more heavily for commercial purposes.
[109] U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions:
Potential Impacts of Energy Technologies by 2010 and Beyond, ORNL/CON-444
(Washington, DC, September 1997); J. DeCicco et al, Technical Options
for Improving the Fuel Economy of U.S. Cars and Light Trucks by
2010-2015 (Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient
Economy, April 2001); M.A. Weiss et al, On the Road in 2020: A Life-Cycle
Analysis of New Automotive Technologies (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, October 2000); A. Vyas, C. Saricks, and
F. Stodolsky, Projected Effect of Future Energy Efficiency and Emissions
Improving Technologies on Fuel Consumption of Heavy Trucks (Argonne,
IL: Argonne National Laboratory, 2001); and Energy and Environmental
Analysis, Inc., Documentation of Technologies included in the NEMS
Fuel Economy Model for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks (prepared
for Energy Information Administration, September 30, 2002).
[110] Values for incremental investments and energy
expenditure savings are discounted back to 2003 at a 7-percent real
discount rate.
[111] Unless otherwise noted, the term “capacity”
in the discussion of electricity generation indicates utility, nonutility,
and combined heat and power capacity. The costs reflect the arithmetic
average of the regional cost.
[112] AEO2004 does not include off-grid photovoltaics
(PV). Based on annual PV shipments from 1989 through 2001, EIA estimates
that as much as 112 megawatts of remote electricity generation PV
applications (i.e., off-grid power systems) were in service in 2001,
plus an additional 305 megawatts in communications, transportation,
and assorted other non-grid-connected, specialized applications.
See Annual Energy Review 2002, Table 10.6 (annual PV shipments,
1989-2001). The approach used to develop the estimate, based on
shipment data, provides an upper estimate of the size of the PV
stock, including both grid-based and off-grid PV. It will overestimate
the size of the stock, because shipments include a substantial number
of units that are exported, and each year some of the PV units installed
earlier will be retired from service or abandoned.
[113] Hydroelectric and landfill gas assumptions
are unchanged from the reference case. Assumptions are obtained
or derived from the Electric Power Research Institute and DOE, Office
of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Renewable Energy Technology
Characterizations, EPRI-TR-109496 (Washington, DC, December 1997),
web site www.eren.doe.gov/power/ techchar.html.
[114] Based on technology characterizations found
in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2003 Power Technologies
Databook. See web site www.nrel.gov/ analysis/power_databook/. Cost
and performance projections in the Databook are sourced to U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy publications and documents.
[115] Associated-dissolved natural gas is produced
in conjunction with crude oil. Nonassociated gas is produced without
crude oil production.
[116] Unconventional gas includes tight (low permeability),
sandstone gas, shale gas, and coalbed methane.
[117] Gas exports from the United States to Mexico
continue to exceed imports from Mexico through the end of the projections.
[118] Variations in mining costs are not necessarily
limited to changes in labor productivity and wage rates. Other factors
that affect mining costs and, subsequently, the price of coal include
such items as severance taxes, royalties, fuel costs, and the costs
of parts and supplies.
[119 ] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, web site
www.epa.gov/airmarkets/arp/overview.html (October 25, 2002).
[120] Buildings: Energy Information Administration
(EIA), Technology Forecast Updates—Residential and Commercial Building
Technologies—Advanced Adoption Case (Arthur D. Little, Inc., October
2001). Industrial: EIA, Industrial Model: Update on Energy Use and
Industrial Characteristics (Arthur D. Little, Inc., September 2001).
Transportation: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy, Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions: Potential
Impacts of Energy Technologies by 2010 and Beyond, ORNL/CON-444
(Washington, DC, September 1997); J. DeCicco and M. Ross, An Updated
Assessment of the Near-Term Potential for Improving Automotive Fuel
Economy (Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient
Economy, November 1993); and A. Vyas, C. Saricks, and F. Stodolsky,
Projected Effect of Future Energy Efficiency and Emissions Improving
Technologies on Fuel Consumption of Heavy Trucks (Argonne, IL: Argonne
National Laboratory, 2001). Fossil-fired generating technologies:
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy. Renewable generating
technologies: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy, and Electric Power Research Institute, Renewable
Energy Technology Characterizations, EPRI-TR-109496 (Washington,
DC, December 1997).
Table
Notes
Table 20. New car and light truck horsepower ratings
and market shares, 1990-2025: History: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Light-Duty Automotive
Technology And Fuel Economy Trends: 1975-2003, EPA-420-S-03-004,
April 2003. Projections: AEO2004 National Energy Modeling System,
run AEO2004.D101703E.
Table 21. Costs of producing electricity from new plants, 2010
and 2025: AEO2004 National Energy Modeling System, run AEO2004.D101703E.
Table 22. Technically recoverable U.S. natural gas resources as
of January 1, 2002: Energy Information Administration, Office of
Integrated Analysis and Forecasting.
Table 23. Onshore and offshore lower 48 crude oil production in
three cases, 2025: AEO2004 National Energy Modeling System, runs
AEO2004.D101703E, LW2004. D101703B, and HW2004.D101703B.
Table 24. Technically recoverable U.S. oil resources as of January
1, 2002: Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated
Analysis and Forecasting.
Table 25. Crude oil production from Gulf of Mexico offshore, 2002-2025:
AEO2004 National Energy Modeling System, run AEO2004.D101703E.
Table 26. Petroleum consumption and net imports in five cases,
2002 and 2025: 2002: Energy Information Administration, Petroleum
Supply Annual 2001, Vol. 1, DOE/EIA-0340(2001)/1 (Washington, DC,
June 2001). 2025: Tables A11, B11, and C11.
Released: January 2004
|