The National Energy Modeling System: An Overview 2003

Footnotes

1 Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2003, DOE/EIA-0383(2003) (Washington, DC, January 2003).

2 Energy Information Administration, Measuring Changes in Energy Efficiency for the Annual Energy Outlook 2002, (Washington, DC, 2002).

3 Energy Information Administration, Analysis of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards for Light Trucks and Increased Alternative Fuel Use, SR/OIAF/2002-05 (Washington, DC, March 2002).

4 Energy Information Administration, Analysis of Efficiency Standards for Air Conditioners, Heat Pumps, and Other Products, SR/OIAF/2002-01 (Washington, DC, February 2002).

5 Energy Information Administration, Analysis of Strategies for Reducing Multiple Emissions from Electric Power Plants With Advanced Technology Scenarios, SR/OIAF/2001-05 (Washington, DC, October 2001).

6 Energy Information Administration, Impact of Renewable Fuels Standard/MTBE Provisions of S. 1766, SR/OIAF/2002-06 (Washington, DC, March 2002).

7 Energy Information Administration, Impact of Renewable Fuels Standard/MTBE Provisions of S. 517, SR/OIAF/2002-06 Addendum (Washington, DC, April 2002).

8 Energy Information Administration, Analysis of Strategies for Reducing Multiple Emissions from Power Plants: Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Carbon Dioxide, SR/OIAF/2000-05 (Washington, DC, December 2000).

9 Energy Information Administration, Impacts of a 10–Percent Renewable Portfolio Standard, SR/OIAF/2002-03 (Washington, DC, February 2002).

10 Energy Information Administration, Impacts of  the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets & Economic Activity, SR/OIAF/98-03 (Washington, DC, October 1998).

11 Energy Information Administration, Reducing Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Mercury from Electric Power Plants, SR/OIAF/2001-04 (Washington, DC, September 2001).

12 Energy Information Administration, The Effects of the Alaska Oil and Natural Gas Provisions of H.R. 4 and S. 1766 on U.S. Energy Markets, SR/OIAF/2002-02 (Washington, DC, February 2002).

13 Energy Information Administration, The Transition to Ultra–Low–Sulfur Diesel Fuel:  Effects on Prices and Supply, SR/OIAF/2001-01 (Washington, DC, May 2001).

14 Energy Information Administration, The Comprehensive Electricity Competition Act:  A Comparison of Model Results, SR/OIAF/99-04 (Washington, DC, September 1999).

15 Energy Information Administration, U.S. Natural Gas Markets: Mid–Term Prospects for Natural Gas Supply, SR/OIAF/2001-06 (Washington, DC, December 2001).

16 Energy Information Administration, U.S. Natural Gas Markets: Recent Trends and Prospects for the Future, SR/OIAF/2001-02 (Washington, DC, May 2001).

17 Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2001, DOE/EIA-0573(2001) (Washington, DC, December 2002).

18 Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2001, DOE/EIA-0573(2001) (Washington, DC, December 2002).

19 In an open, competitive permit market, the permit will tend to be priced at the marginal cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, regardless of the initial distribution of permits.  If permits are purchased by suppliers and passed through to the fuel price, the marginal cost of the carbon dioxide emissions by a particular sector in a region will be reflected in the individual end–use fuel cost for tht sector.

20 Eviews is a model building and operating software package  maintained by QMS (Quantitative Micro Software.)

21 Energy Information Administration, Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2003, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/pdf/0554(2003).pdf (Washington, DC, January 2003).

22 Energy Information Administration, Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2003, http://www.eia.doe.gov/loiaf/aeo/assumption/pdf/0554(2003).pdf (Washington, DC, January 2003).

23 Energy Information Administration, Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2003, http:/www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/pdf/0554(2003).pdf (Washngton, DC, January 2003).

24 Greene, David L. and S.M. Chin, “Alternative Fuels and Vehicles (AFV) Model Changes,” Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, page 1,  (Oak Ridge, TN, November 14, 2000).

25 U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, prepared by Interlaboratory Working Group, Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions: Potential Impacts of Energy Technologies by 2010 and Beyond, (Washington, DC, 1998).

26 Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc., Updates to the Fuel Economy Model (FEM) and Advanced Technology Vehicle (ATV) Module of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Transportation Model, Prepared for the Energy Information Administration (EIA), (Arlington, VA, October 23, 2000).

27 Energy Informtion Administration, Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2003, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/pdf/0554(2003).pdf (January 2003).

28 Urban Wood Waste and Mill Residues: Antares Group, Inc; Forest and Crop Residues: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Energy Crops:  Oak Ridge Energy Crop County Level Database (December 20, 1996); and Agricultural Residues:  Oak Ridge National Laoboratory.

29 U.S. Department of Agriculture, USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2011, Staff Report WAOB-2002-01 (Washington, DC, February 2002).