| Home > Renewables > Renewable Fuels Publications > Renewable Energy 2000 - Issues and Trends > Forces Behind Wind Power |
Report Date: February 2001 Next Release Date: None Forces Behind Wind PowerPage
2
Physical and Operational Characteristics of Wind Farm Turbines
This section discusses the results of these efforts and their impact on enabling wind farm developers to optimize WECS design based on site requirements. Information focuses on technology deployed by Enron/Zond, Vestas, and NEG Micon, the current major wind farm developers in the United States. Technology Advances for Improved Wind Farm Performance and Reliability. The current generation of utility-scale wind turbines uses technology developed over the past 20 years. Advances in technology have resulted in lower installed cost per kilowatt of a wind turbine, improved turbine performance, and improved turbine reliability and reduced maintenance cost. Following are some of the major improvements that have made these benefits possible:
The general trend is toward wind turbines with maximum power output of 1 MW or more. European firms--such as Danish companies Vestas and NEG Micon--currently have more than 10 turbine designs in the megawatt range with commercial sales. Due to decreasing wind development sites with adequate wind regimes on the landmass, Europe has recently focused on developing larger-than-megawatt turbines for offshore wind farms. Because expensive foundations are required for offshore applications, the cost of such wind plants can be up to 30 percent higher. However, due to stronger winds offshore (as well as the water's smoother surface than land), the higher production will offset the higher installation costs over the life of the facility. Aside from this, Vestas and Micon still lead the markets in manufacturing advanced, land-based, utility-scale turbines. In 1999, Micon and Vestas were the number one and number two wind turbine manufacturers worldwide, sharing about 40 percent of the global market.(23) Wind turbine design is dictated by a combination of technology, prevailing wind regime, and economics. Wind turbine manufacturers optimize machines to deliver electricity at the lowest possible cost per kilowatthour (kWh) of energy. Design efforts benefit from knowledge of the wind speed distribution and wind energy content corresponding to the different speeds and the comparative costs of different systems to arrive at the optimal rotor/generator combination. Optimizing for the lowest overall cost considers design factors such as relative sizes of rotor, generator, and tower height. For example, small generators (i.e., a generator with low rated power output in kW) require less force to turn than larger ones. Therefore, fitting a large wind turbine rotor with a small generator will produce electricity during many hours of the year (harvesting energy at lower wind speeds), but will capture only a small portion of high-speed wind energy. Conversely, a large generator will be efficient at high wind speeds, but unable to turn at low wind speeds. For a given turbine rated output (e.g., 750 kW), rotor diameter can be a design variable, specifying a smaller rotor diameter for turbines that will operate at sites with high wind speeds. In addition, system design can be optimized further and performance efficiency can be increased with innovative tower design, increased tower height to 50-70 meters (which increases energy output), and lighter weight turbines. In general, most utility-scale wind turbines on the market today are three-bladed systems that use asynchronous generators and sophisticated controls to monitor and regulate turbine operation in different conditions and the quality of power delivered to the grid. The following synopses provide a general overview of the current technologies utilized by the three major utility-scale wind turbine manufacturers to optimize design.(24) NEG Micon has the simplest design while Zond the most complex design:
Operational Characteristics
Ability to Operate Over a Range of Wind Speeds. Currently available wind turbine designs enable reliable operation over a range of wind speeds. Rotor diameter can be modified from a standard diameter to one slightly larger for sites with low wind speeds or one slightly smaller for sites with high wind speeds. Protecting Turbines in High Winds. Wind turbines are designed to operate up to a certain wind speed. Winds above this speed could damage the turbine, so all turbines are designed with a cut-off or shutdown mechanism. The following examples discuss such mechanisms for each major manufacturer:
Ability to Operate in Hot or Cold Climates. In hot climates, the transmission cooling system is upgraded, and blades are made with epoxy resins that withstand heat and ultraviolet light. In cold climates, a heater is added to ensure that generator oil, transmission fluid, and hydraulic systems are maintained at adequate operating temperatures. Black blades are advantageous as a deicing mechanism in cold climates because they absorb heat. For example, the NEG Micon turbine operates optimally in the -20ºC to 35ºC range.(27) Below -20ºC, a cold weather package is installed; above 35ºC, a hot weather package is installed. Ability to Operate in Coastal Salty Air. Paint sealants and nacelle designs that inhibit penetration of salty air are used to protect the turbine, generator, blades, and tower from corrosion. The sealant is baked on at the factory. Lightning Protection. Lightning is attracted to the tallest structure in an area, making wind turbines a prime target. Turbines are designed with a lightning protection system, and lightning damage may be included in the warranty. For instance, Vestas offers "Total Lightning Protection" in its 600 kW and 1.65 MW turbines, providing a route for the lightning to travel through the turbine to the ground.(28) Vestas blades are protected by a 50 mm2 copper conductor, enabling lightning to travel along the blade without a significant increase in temperature. The lightning travels from the blade to the blade hub into the nacelle. The rear of the nacelle is protected by a lightning conductor. Lightning protection in the nacelle protects the wind vane and anemometer. Lightning is carried down the tower to the earthing system through two parallel copper conductors. The earthing system, which provides grounding for the turbine, consists of a thick copper ring conductor placed one meter below the surface and one meter from the turbine's concrete foundation. The copper ring is attached to two diametrically opposed points on the tower and to two copper-coated earthing rods on either side of the foundation. Additionally, the turbine transformer is also protected. Compatibility with Grid Power Quality. "Power quality" refers to voltage stability, frequency stability, and absence of various forms of electrical noise (e.g., flicker or harmonic distortion) on the electrical grid. Power companies deliver three phases of alternating current and power, each with a smooth sinusoidal shape, with few jags, breaks, or surges in any phase (less than 9 percent harmonic distortion). Once the wind is strong enough to turn the rotor and generator, the turbine connects and is synchronized to the grid's phase. Lack of synchronization may lead to rotor overspeeding and overtaxing of equipment components. The impact on the turbine could be costly equipment wear and tear. Wind turbine designs and balance of system components are available currently that enable grid-connected wind farms to provide electric power in a form compatible with grid power quality. Different manufacturers have different solutions, as seen in the following examples:
Electronic controllers in modern wind turbines prevent damage from power surges by constantly monitoring grid voltage and frequency. For example, disturbances in the grid may lead to "islanding," which refers to a power outage in one part of the grid while the wind-connected section of the grid is still supplied with power. If disturbances are large enough to cause islanding, electronic controllers automatically disconnect the turbines from the grid, and aerodynamic brakes are used to stop the rotor. As connection to the grid is re-established, electronic controllers protect the turbine from power surges. An asynchronous or induction generator, which generates alternating current, is presently used for wind farm applications. These inexpensive generators may be described as an electric motor that operates in reverse, generating rather than consuming electricity. Wind cranks the rotor, which creates an electromagnetic force in the generator. The faster the rotor moves (greater than the generator stator's rotating magnetic field), the more current is induced in the generator and converted to electricity, which is fed into the grid. One of the most important properties of an induction motor is that it will reduce its speed, as increases in wind speed lead to an increase in torque on the motor, leading to less wear and tear on the gearbox. Another beneficial feature is that the generator must be magnetized by power from the grid before it works, facilitating its synchronization with grid power. Current Federal R&D To Improve WECS Performance and Reliability
The objective of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Wind Energy Program is to enable the U.S. wind industry to complete the research, testing, and field verification needed to fully develop cost-effective and reliable advanced wind technology.(29) Activities are classified under one of three research areas: applied research, turbine research (which includes large, utility-scale turbines), and cooperative research and testing. The cooperative research and testing activity offers the wind industry the facilities to test their turbines and turbine components and provides a turbine certification test program. This activity helps the industry control costs by limiting the extent to which turbine manufacturers in the United States need to invest in and staff such facilities. Applied Research.(30) The Applied Research Program seeks to understand the basic scientific and engineering principles that govern wind technology and underlie the aerodynamics and mechanical performance of wind turbines. The program also seeks to improve the cost and reliability of different wind turbines by conducting applied research in the following areas:
Turbine Research.(31) The objective of this research is to assist the U.S. wind power industry in developing competitive, high-performance, reliable wind turbine technology for global energy markets. The program funds competitively selected industry partners in their development of advanced technologies. Wind turbines in various sizes from 10 kW to more than 1 MW are constructed and tested. Currently, some of the research projects include: a Near-Term Research and Testing contract with Zond Energy Systems; Next-Generation Turbine Development contracts with the Wind Turbine Company and Zond Energy Systems; Small Wind Turbine Projects with Bergey Windpower Company, WindLite Corporation, and World Power Technology; and a cold weather turbine development contract with Northern Power Systems. Cooperative Research and Testing. The Federal Government, through the National Wind Technology Center at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, offers cooperative research, testing and certification, and standards programs to wind turbine manufacturers.(32) Without these programs, the industry would bear the costs, which would be reflected in a higher wind turbine cost. Cooperative research enables turbine manufacturers to leverage their R&D efforts with related Federal efforts and ensures, through commitment of manufacturer resources, that R&D worthwhile to them is pursued. Wind turbine blade testing includes three types of tests--ultimate static strength, fatigue, and nondestructive--to identify and correct problems before going into full-scale production. Modal testing provides useful information about the structural dynamic characteristics of a wind turbine system. This information is used to avoid designs that are susceptible to fatigue-related failure and excessive vibrations. Testing of full-scale wind turbine drivetrains on a 2.5 MW Dynamometer Test Stand located at NREL was initiated in mid-1999. The dynamometer can test turbine drivetrains as large as 2 MW both to identify weak points in the design and to measure the lifetime of systems. Receipt of certification services enable U.S. manufacturers to show that their turbines meet international standards; such certification is needed for U.S.-made turbines to sell in many foreign markets. Operation and Maintenance for Wind Farm Turbines Modern wind turbines are designed for about 120,000 hours of operation over a 20-year lifetime.(33) During this period, planned preventive maintenance and breakdown maintenance are performed. Additionally, system components may be replaced as their performance degrades; such replacements also are performed to extend the operating life of the turbine. Generally, maintenance costs are low for new turbines and increase as the turbine ages. Failure of wind turbine system components can be characterized by a relatively higher initial rate of failure followed by a lower failure rate through most of the turbine's design life until components begin to wear. During the initial period, assembly defects are detected and rectified. Commonly, wind turbines are sold with a 2- to 5-year manufacturer warrantee covering the cost to repair these design-related breakdowns.(34) Wind turbine models are available today for which minimal initial failure rate problems may be expected because the current turbine design is (1) a variation of past designs that have proven successful in the field and (2) manufactured with adequate quality assurance procedures. The reliability of new turbine designs improves over time as field experience enables resolution of technical problems. Field experience is particularly important for more complex designs, including those that deviate more from past design generations. The average annual maintenance cost for newer turbines is approximately 1.5 percent to 2.0 percent of the cost of the machine.(35) Most of the maintenance expenses are associated with the routine service of turbines. Wind turbine manufacturers and service contractors certified to perform maintenance on a manufacturer's turbines can be contracted on an annual basis to perform planned preventive maintenance. For example, the cost of a preventive maintenance contract for a 750 kW turbine ranges from $12,000 to $14,000 per year, per turbine.(36) Maintenance on a 600 kW or 660 kW turbine can be performed for a comparable cost, $12,500 per year, per turbine.(37) Comparable maintenance on a 1.65 MW turbine would increase to $18,000 per year, per turbine.(38) Some analyses state the cost of preventive maintenance in terms of dollars per kilowatthour of electricity output. When expressed in these units, turbines with higher annual kilowatthours of electricity output have lower per-kilowatthour maintenance cost. A turbine with higher electricity output either has a higher maximum kilowatt output rating or a higher capacity factor. Such analyses have stated a maintenance cost of around $0.01 per kWh.(39) Larger generation capacity turbines are serviced at the same frequency and cost as smaller ones, which results in a lower maintenance cost per installed kW; however, over time stresses and strains inherent in operation of larger capacity turbines cause more wear and tear on system components, leading to accelerated component replacement. Additionally, wind farms benefit from the economy of scale related to semi-annual maintenance visits, administration, and inspection. Wind farm operators increase the life of a turbine by replacing certain components, such as rotor blades, generators, and gearboxes, which are subject to more wear before the end of the turbine's design life. The price of replacement components is usually 15 percent to 20 percent of the price of the turbine and can extend the life of the turbine by the same or longer amount.(40) Planned Maintenance Planned maintenance covers all preventive maintenance, including routine checks, periodic maintenance, periodic testing, blade cleaning, and high voltage equipment maintenance. Routine checks are performed monthly for every machine using a checklist that includes inspection of the gearbox and oil levels, inspection for oil leaks, observation of the running machine for unusual drive train vibrations, brake disc inspection, and inspection of all emergency escape equipment. Periodic maintenance takes place approximately every 6 months and includes checking the security of all supports and attachments, high-speed shaft alignment, brake adjustment and pad wear, and yaw mechanism performance; greasing bearings; inspecting cable terminations; and replacing oil filters. For pitch-regulated machines, the pitch calibration is also checked. In addition, this may be the time to replace components that are known to fail after a few years of operation, such as anemometers, wind vanes, and batteries. Periodic testing of the overspeed protection system should be conducted to ensure proper operation of this feature. Blade cleaning should be a maintenance consideration when the performance of the turbine is affected due to dirt buildup; however, because of the high cost of equipment for accessing the blades, this task should be evaluated for cost-effectiveness. High voltage equipment maintenance is usually contracted to the utility company. Electrical Safety Maintenance Regular maintenance of the turbine's electrical systems and a complete set of replacement parts minimize downtimes caused by electrical faults and ensure operational efficiency. A maintenance program may consist of monthly inspection of breakers, security, and battery voltages; annual checks of relay settings, oil levels, ground connections, and corrosion; 2-year interval testing of protection mechanisms, oil quality and levels, and high voltage circuit breakers; and 4-year inspections of all the switchgear, the grid transformer, and all wiring. In addition, since some components need to be ordered, carrying a comprehensive set of replacement parts may be the difference between minor downtime or shutdown of the entire wind farm to await delivery. For this reason, a full set of protection relays, transformer windings, bushings, moving contacts, fuses, and gaskets must be stocked on-site. Breakdown Maintenance The frequency of wind turbine shutdowns or breakdowns is affected by operational factors and design complexity. More major system faults are generally categorized as human error, "acts of God," design faults, or system component wear and tear. Operational factors that affect breakdown frequency include overspeeding, excessive vibration, low gearbox oil pressure, yaw error, pitch error, unprompted braking, synchronization failure, loss of grid, and loss of batteries. A significant portion of wind turbine maintenance events can be detected by wind turbine system controllers, which can sense problems such as loose connections due to vibration or defective sensors. Wind turbine designs, evolving with new research and development breakthroughs, have in some cases become more complex. Initially, a turbine that incorporates several new design concepts may experience an increase in breakdown frequency when compared to older proven turbine designs. Breakdowns may be caused by the design of a specific part or by problems that arise when parts incorporated into the new design do not function together as a system. Field experience enables technical problems to be detected, facilitating their resolution through additional development. Beyond the initial period of resolving technical problems in a new turbine design, more complex machines may experience higher expenditures on periodic planned maintenance and higher replacement part costs. Expected higher expenditures do not necessarily reflect on the reliability of the turbine; they reflect more on the cost of maintaining and replacing complex parts. The cost-effectiveness of the turbine depends on such costs being covered by the incremental electricity production benefit that rationalizes the new design. In Europe, gradual changes in wind turbine design during the past 20 years have been accompanied by testing and certification and by the hours of field experience needed to demonstrate wind turbine reliability. This process of turbine design, testing, certification, and field experience has resulted in the NEG Micon and Vestas wind turbines deployed in wind farms currently being developed in the United States and worldwide. In the United States, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., have worked together to provide comparable turbine testing and certification for U.S. wind turbine companies.(41) Summary
Research and development throughout the past 20 years has resulted in a current generation of utility-scale wind turbines, with maximum electricity generating capacity often exceeding 500 kW per turbine, designed for about 120,000 hours of operation over a 20-year lifetime. In the United States, wind farm development activity in 1999 was motivated by the June 1999 expiration of the Federal production tax credit, and dominated by installation of utility-scale turbines manufactured by NEG Micon and Vestas, both Danish firms, and by Zond Energy Systems, a subsidiary of Enron Wind Corporation, a U.S. firm. Research and development for utility-scale turbines has been directed toward increasing the amount of wind energy that a turbine can convert into electricity for the lowest amount of capital investment and the lowest on-going operating cost. Following are examples of the R&D efforts that have contributed to current utility-scale turbine technology:
In the United States, the Zond Z-750 series turbine represents a very innovative but less gradual design change. Enron Wind Corporation wind farms, which use the Zond Z-750 technology, address the risk of the design innovation with performance contracts that guarantee turbine electricity production, in addition to power curve and reliability guarantees normally included in wind turbine performance contracts. The results of R&D have been incorporated into utility-scale wind turbine design more gradually in Europe, followed by operation in wind farms to assess reliability over time. Near-term R&D efforts are expected to continue in directions that increase the efficiency with which wind turbines convert wind energy to electricity. For instance, researchers report that further optimization of blade design is possible.(42) Taller towers and rotor/generator systems with maximum power ratings exceeding 1 MW will continue to be improved. Other areas of development that affect turbine cost include advanced manufacturing methods and use of alternative, more cost-effective materials for turbine system, and tower fabrication. The result of turbine R&D has been a reliable utility-scale wind turbine generator that can be optimized for operation in a variety of wind farm locations. For example, annual wind farm capacity factors of 28.5 percent to 32 percent have been achieved in Denmark and the United States, respectively, and capacity factors of 35 percent to 38 percent are projected for wind farm capacity that was recently installed in Minnesota and Iowa, respectively (Table 4). Endnotes 21. The inverter converts "direct current" (DC) to "alternating current" (AC). This is necessary in some turbine designs because variations in wind speeds can cause variations in the "frequency" (e.g., 60 cycles per second) of AC power production, which must be tightly controlled in order to be usable. In contrast, DC "power conditioning" issues are easier to manage. Therefore, wind turbines often convert AC-generated wind power to DC, condition it, and use the inverter to convert it back into AC electricity. 22. BTM Consult ApS, International Wind Energy Development-World Market Update 1999 (Aingkobing, Denmark, March 2000), p. 15. 23. Ibid., p. 15. 24. Information is based on manufacturer literature and on personal communications between Donald M. Hardy, PanAero Corporation (Lakewood, CO) and William R. King, SAIC, 1999. 25. For a given design, wind speeds beyond certain levels can damage the turbine. By varying the "pitch" (angle) of the blade tips at higher wind speeds, the blades will turn slower, reducing stress on the blade. 26. Unless noted otherwise, information in this section is based on manufacturer literature and on personal communications between Donald M. Hardy, PanAero Corporation (Lakewood, CO) and William R. King, SAIC, 1999. 27. Personal communication between Jesper Michaelsen, Marketing Manager, NEG Micon USA, Inc., and William R. King, SAIC, 1999. 28. Vestas, manufacturer literature, 1999. 29. U.S. Department of Energy and National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Wind Power Today, DOE/GO-102000-0966 (Washington, DC, April 2000), p. 28. 30. Ibid., pp. 29-30. 31. U.S. Department of Energy and National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Wind Power Today, DOE/GO-102000-0966 (Washington, DC, April 2000), p. 31-32. 32. Ibid., p. 32. 33. Danish Wind Turbine Manufacturers Association, "Operation and Maintenance Costs for Wind Turbines." See website http://www.windpower.dk/tour/econ/oandm.htm (October 23, 2000). 34. Personal communication between Donald M. Hardy, PanAero Corporation (Lakewood, CO) and William R. King, SAIC, 1999. 35. Danish Wind Turbine Manufacturers Association, "Operation and Maintenance Costs for Wind Turbines." See website http://www.windpower.dk/tour/econ/oandm.htm (October 23, 2000). 36. Personal communication between Donald M. Hardy, PanAero Corporation (Lakewood, CO) and William R. King, SAIC, 1999. 37. Personal communication between Soren Christensen, Project & Sales Coordinator, Vestas-American Wind Technology (North Palm Springs, CA), and William R. King, SAIC, November 1999. 38. Ibid. 39. U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Utility Technologies) and Electric Power Research Institute, Renewable Energy Technology Characterizations, TR-109496 (Washington, DC, December 1997), p. 6-13. Danish Wind Turbine Manufacturers Association, "Operation and Maintenance Costs for Wind Turbines." See website http://www.windpower.dk/tour/econ/oandm.htm (October 23, 2000). 40. Danish Wind Turbine Manufacturers Association, "Operation and Maintenance Costs for Wind Turbines." See website http://www.windpower.dk/tour/econ/oandm.htm (October 23, 2000). 41. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Certification Program Opens Markets to U.S. Turbines, DOE/GO-10099-820 (Golden, Colorado, June 1999), p. 16. 42. U.S. Department of Energy and National Renewable
Energy Laboratory, Wind Power Today, DOE/GO-102000-0966 (Washington,
DC, April 2000), p. 31-32.
|